Information from the Ebola battlefront in West Africa paints a very gloomy picture: Ebola is raging and is killing more than 200 people a day.

The deadly virus respects no international borders, and has thus become not just a problem for the hardest-hit countries, but a life-and-death challenge facing the global community.

The cruel reality prompted UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to convene a high-level meeting recently to respond to the largest and most deadly Ebola outbreak the world has ever seen.

The event, which came on the sidelines of the annual high-level UN debate, brought together heads of state and government, and high-ranking officials from UN member states in solidarity with the people of Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone, the three hardest-hit countries since the outbreak of the disease early this year.

The World Health Organization has predicted that if the disease is not brought under control, the number of cases could easily exceed 20,000 by early November.

The Ebola virus was detected in the remote jungles of southeastern Guinea in March, and quickly spread across the border to Liberia and Sierra Leone. It has also briefly touched Nigeria.

"Several months down the line, the international community is finally coming around to the better view that the Ebola outbreak is a challenge for everyone," Ernest Bai Koroma, president of Sierra Leone, told the high-level UN meeting.

The grim reality is this: Only 18 percent of Ebola patients in Liberia are being cared for in hospitals or other settings that reduce the risk of transmission by isolating them from the rest of the population.

Sierra Leone, struck by Ebola for the first time ever, and other West African countries at the frontlines of this fight "require the heavy aerial and ground support of the world to defeat a disease worse than terrorism," Koroma said.

In fact, Ban said that contributions of member states "are falling significantly short of the 20-fold surge that is required."

One of the key shortfalls, UN officials and aid workers have said, is the urgent need for countries to agree to transport and treat aid workers who become infected.

At present, more treatment centers, labs and equipment, more clinicians, nurses and other health workers in treatment and holding centers, more training for national doctors, nurses and other health workers on safe and effective clinical and nutritional interventions and information managers are all urgently needed, according to the Sierra Leonean president.

Many countries have moved in response to the crisis, but some have gone in the wrong direction.

As the secretary-general put it: "Many have tried to shut out the virus by closing their borders. Several airlines have stopped serving the three countries. The number of ships docking at their ports has dwindled. But such an approach only makes the situation worse, isolating countries when they need help most."

In sharp contrast, China did the right thing by dispatching medical workers and earmarking millions of dollars to aid the three hardest-hit West African countries.

"The epidemic may be merciless, but love is trans-boundary," said Foreign Minister Wang Yi of China, "We have 1.3 billion people standing with you."

The Chinese move has been hailed by the international community as an action by a responsible developing power.

With the incoming international assistance on the rise, encouraging news is being reported.

In some treatment centers, patients are receiving the care they need.

In several locations, community-based programs are yielding promising results.

There is still a long way to go before the international community brings the Ebola crisis under control.

To this end, concerted world efforts are required simply because Ebola is so dangerous that even slightly belated action could lead to an exponential increase in transmissions.

That is why faster response, of a kind similar to responses to natural disasters like hurricanes and earthquakes, is required.

This calls for faster deployment of resources at the global, national and local levels.

Any break in this chain could result in more deaths in West Africa and greater possibility of the virus mutating and spreading into other countries and continents.

The author is a writer with the Xinhua News Agency. opinion@globaltimes.com.cn