The development of Hong Kong's situation will be dominated by China, and the city will gradually return to the right track under the framework of the Basic Law. All people living in Hong Kong must understand that the city will not be determined by the US.
China has won the first battle against the epidemic, and this is worthy of pride. But to maintain victories, we must also look at what is going on in the world. It is a global fight, and situations in other battlefields will affect the Chinese battlefield.
Washington's China policy has gone too far, which appears tough but is actually weak inside. The US has few cards to play, and is pushing itself to the status of a paper tiger.
China does not pursue its interests to the extreme, nor does it demand a perfect bilateral relationship. China is willing to seek common ground while reserving differences. China avoids becoming enemies with other countries if they fail to be friends, and China focuses on doing its own things well when there are diplomatic problems.
It is hoped that the Indian side will not repeat its historical mistakes and avoid an aggressive posture in its border dispute with China. It should head in the same direction with China and put the situation under the control of both sides.
A draft law on safeguarding national security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) made its debut on Saturday. One could reach the conclusion that as long as we view the draft in a fair and objective manner - Beijing sincerely hopes to maintain the "one country, two systems" principle; the purpose of enacting the law is to fix national security loopholes in Hong Kong, rather than depriving the city of its high degree of autonomy.
Washington will eventually find that as it tries harder to isolate China, it will actually isolate itself further in many cases. How it describes China is more like describing itself.
Some Indian political forces and public opinion should stop inciting their troops to take provocative action along the border. Please tell the Indian soldiers that a peaceful LAC is where India's real interests lie. In addition to being brave, soldiers should also be politically clear-headed and have a broad vision.
Is a new cold war in line with any country's interests? Is that what most American people really want, or just the few fanatics in geopolitics and ideology?
The Indian side especially must fulfill its promise and implement the consensus reached between the two countries. The border issue is the most sensitive part of China-India relations. Only when it is eased can the two engage in cooperation in a composed manner.
The arrogance and recklessness of the Indian side is the main reason for the consistent tensions along China-India borders. In recent years, New Delhi has adopted a tough stance on border issues, which is mainly resulted from two misjudgments.
No pain, no gain; no action, no effect. The measures the capital is taking show that the virus will eventually be curbed here, while places that haven't taken corresponding measures will have to bear the price.
The pandemic could last months, even years. We may have to make a change: turning comprehensive prevention, which aims to clear any outbreak within a short time, to precise prevention and simultaneously bearing some uncertainties.
Beijing can quickly control the epidemic, and this is not in question.
A majority of Twitter accounts to varying degrees tweet extreme views about China. As a platform, Twitter needs voices that are against the anti-China content to secure a “balance.”
Time continues to widen such differences and will make people think. The ideological fortifications built by Pompeo and his likes will finally collapse.
China's political system is different from that of the Western world, and divergences on values exist between the two. But these divergences should not necessarily be turned into Western countries' sense of threat from China.
Beijing has made it crystal clear that the law targets only very few criminals, not the wider public. It has stressed that the more solid it holds the security bottom line, the more room the “one country, two systems” principle will have.