The relationship between China and Vietnam is about more than politics or economics. It's about building a future where both nations – and the region as a whole – can thrive. In a time when the world often feels divided and uncertain, their partnership reminds us of what can be achieved through cooperation and shared goals.

To what extent should Australia achieve its strategic autonomy and truly serve its own interests? Is the vision of the Asia-Pacific in the US blueprint the future Australia wants?

The Spring Festival travel rush is not merely an emotional connection for the Chinese people; it also reflects China's cultural soft power and international influence.

Americans are suffering because the country has lost the ability to unite and transcend divisions in times of crisis. To make a shift, the US must champion cooperation.

The two approaches – market-oriented and government-led – vividly illustrate the differences of China and the US in responding to their natural disasters. Despite the differences, both Chinese and US systems must ultimately be evaluated based on their adherence to the shared principle of "putting people at the center." #CaliforniaWildfires #XizangEarthquake

The US has developed a formulaic approach to smear China on cyberattack topics: no technical details, no investigative reports, and no credible evidence.

In the tense context of global geopolitics, the positive trends of connectivity between China, Japan and South Korea serve as a vivid example.

The inner momentum of China-Africa relations will always stand the test of times and drive the relations deeper and further.

The rhetoric of the US valuing its allies seems even more hypocritical in light of its recent rejection of Japan's Nippon Steel's purchase of US Steel.

The Biden administration's move reinforces a growing perception that the US is prioritizing its own economic security over the interests of its partners. This could strain alliances and push countries like Japan, as well as EU members, to seek closer economic ties with other nations.

On the first day of 2025, nine countries - Belarus, Bolivia, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Thailand, Cuba, Uganda, Malaysia and Uzbekistan - officially became BRICS partners. This marks another milestone in the development of BRICS, following the historic expansion of the group.

In 2025, we hope the Philippines will engage less in playing the victim, stop inciting and sensationalizing conflicts, and move toward a more cooperative approach with China regarding the South China Sea issue.

President Mulino's response not only defended Panama's rights but also sent a message to the world: the era of unchecked hegemony is over.

From a global perspective, China has been a peaceful force in many ways. It has been promoting the settlement of disputes through peaceful means, advocating building a peaceful, secure and just international order. The development of its national defense capabilities will enable China to provide more crucial support for maintaining international order and countering hegemonism and unilateralism.

For the two Asian giants, China and India, to become anchors in this turbulent world, they must recognize the historical responsibilities they bear, viewing both bilateral and Global South interests from a long-term and strategic perspective. The relationship between China and India does not have to be one of this-or-that; in fact, both sides can walk together on the Global South's "red carpet."

China's rapid progress in this sector is nothing but an opportunity for global green transformation, rather than being maliciously portrayed as a "risk." As this cooperation deepens, more Southeast Asian countries will benefit from the wave of green transformation.

In an era dominated by openness and inclusivity, if the Philippines continues to languish in "persecutory delusions" and pursue its misguided allegiance to larger powers, it will only find itself increasingly isolated - not only from other ASEAN countries but from many other developing nations as well.

On Sunday local time, Panamanian President José Molino issued a statement in a social media video post: Every square meter of the Panama Canal and its adjacent area belong to Panama and will remain so, and "the sovereignty and independence of our country are not negotiable." These remarks were in response to comments made by the US president-elect the day before, who called the Panama Canal "a VITAL National Asset for the United States," threatening to retake the canal, citing "exorbitant prices" on US ships. If the logic is that anyone who considers a canal vital can lay claim to it, what would be the point of international law, sovereignty, and territorial integrity in such a world?

"Made in China" has become shorthand for "potential threat" in Washington's vocabulary. This conditioned response offers immediate political benefits – appearing vigilant and tough on China – but does little to address widespread systemic vulnerabilities across all networking devices, regardless of origin.

From "spy balloons" to "spy cranes" to "spy drones"... these absurd and paranoid labels reflect the distorted and narrow-minded mentality of some US politicians in their attempts to contain and suppress China. The current wave of drone hysteria only deepens the paranoia, making the US a breeding ground for delusion, irrationality, and instability.

Forcing regional countries to choose sides and adopt an “India first” foreign policy reflects India's long-held, bossy and narrow-minded attitude toward countries in South Asia

In the face of skepticism, the Chinese economy is proving its strong resilience and promising prospects by presenting one new highlight after another. Its future is worth anticipating and will continue to contribute positively to the world economy.

Despite its potential, the renewed STA faces challenges.

What about the US' "culture of warfighting"? Can such a militaristic ideology that has already brought tragedies to the world have a vitality of more than 2,500 years? The answer is self-evident.

The US uses China's normal space activities as an excuse to incite tension and escalate great-power confrontation, forming militarized space alliances. This is escalating regional tensions and increasing the potential for military conflict, rather than "maintaining peace."

History has shown that those who embrace diversity and attract talent will thrive. The US needs to revisit its core values of the so-called diversity and openness. But the question remains: will the US reflect on its current path? How much longer before another Chinese scientist chooses to leave the US?

Washington has been Kiev's main "financial supporter" in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict. However, it continues to shift some of the bloodiest "costs" of war to Ukraine itself.

Some US politicians are calling for preparation for war. This suggestion is not a strategic plan at all, but a form of strategic self-destruction.

The Philippines should recognize China's resolve and capabilities in defending territorial sovereignty and maritime rights, as demonstrated by a series of control measures taken by China in response to Manila's provocations over the South China Sea issue. The self-directed drama staged by the Philippines ultimately amounts to nothing more than a one-man show that fails to make any significant impact.

The US Typhon missile system, which was transported from the US to northern Philippines for joint military exercises early this year, was supposed to leave the country but has since then been retained. This situation seems to have emboldened some analysts, who hype the "China threat" as the reason for the missile deployment in the Philippines and accused China of "seeking to impose its will on neighbors." In particular, Army Brigadier General Michael Logico, spokesman of the military exercises, was cited by the media as saying, "China has no right to tell us what to do."

The achievements China has made in green transformation and addressing climate change are widely recognized around the world. However, some Western media outlets have chosen to deliberately turn a blind eye, persistently smearing China's efforts with an extremely arrogant and narrow-minded attitude. This fully exposes the double standards of the West when it comes to environmental issues.

Tadashi Yanai, CEO of Uniqlo's parent company, Fast Retailing, recently stated in a BBC interview that the company is not using cotton from China's Xinjiang region. His remarks have triggered a backlash against the brand among some Chinese consumers, while simultaneously reignited discussions about the challenges multinational corporations (MNCs) face amid global geopolitical tensions.

Former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger famously stated, "It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal." To US allies, they should particularly be careful: With allies like the US, who needs enemies?

The G7 constantly talks about its "unwavering commitment" to Kiev, yet never stops its "unwavering smearing" against China.

It tests the wisdom of the UK to have a sophisticated approach to be effective in dealing with China.

As China continues to diversify its economy and strengthen its domestic market, the effectiveness of tariffs as a policy tool may be reaching its limits.

Where are the "human rights" and "humanitarian values" that the US so often proclaims? Is it really that “Palestinian Lives Don't Matter”?

The strength of the momentum for improvement in bilateral relations in the future will largely depend on the sincerity of the Indian side. It is hoped that India can allow consensus, rather than differences, to shape China-India relations.

The past decade of the WIC Wuzhen Summit has been a period of China contributing to internet governance, offering Chinese wisdom, and fulfilling its responsibilities as a major power.

The development of China-Latin America's economic and trade relations is not just a trend, but an inevitable outcome.

The US has forgotten what healthy competition truly looks like.

The growth of the airshow is a testament to the progress of China's national defense. Through Airshow China, China has demonstrated the innovative achievements and strong capabilities of its aerospace industry, while also reflecting the country's open attitude and commitment to peaceful development in high-tech fields.

The evidence is clear: international cooperation, not confrontation, better serves American industrial interests.

China's strategy for dealing with external turbulences is multifaceted and comprehensive. This comprehensive approach instills confidence in China's ability to navigate the challenges such as the trade war.

ASEAN countries have a clear view of the Philippines' intentions.

For Australia, continuing to adopt the US' Cold War mentality and constantly amplifying the "China threat" brings no benefit.

Some Australian politicians' tendency to overstretch the concept of security is a typical behavior that manipulates security issues to hinder economic cooperation.

China will not deliberately seek to decouple its supply chain and industrial chain from the US, nor will it make replacing the US a strategic goal.

Cuba's struggle is a microcosm of the hegemonic behavior of the US in an attempt to control other countries through unilateral sanctions, but instead stand opposite to the majority in the world.

The Taiwan Straits is not a stage for any external forces to put on a political show. Any provocation and harm to China's sovereignty and security regarding the Taiwan question is firmly opposed. The Taiwan question is China's internal affair, and maintaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Straits hinges on firmly opposing "Taiwan independence."

Indulging in stirring troubles in the South China Sea just for the sake of obtaining “prominence” will only strengthen the world's negative impression of the Philippines.

In the South China Sea, China proactively carried out a wealth of public goods, ranging from meteorological services to environmental protection, transportation upgradation and maritime escort. Meanwhile, what are the US and the Philippines up to? The answer is simple: stirring up conflict and undermining stability.

Looking ahead, the “not easy” journey of normalizing China-India relations will require a sustained diplomatic effort. However, its significance extends beyond bilateral relations.

By insisting on a hardline stance toward China, the US is allowing its space sector to be further poisoned by anti-China politics and containment strategies, thereby weakening and hindering beneficial cooperation between the two nations while closing the door to broader exploration opportunities.

Is deployment of the Typhon missile system really "incredibly important" for the Philippines? To a large extent, the “defense bundle-up” that the US provides to the Philippines is akin to a dose of an addictive drug – Washington is attempting to shape the Philippines into a highly US-dependent country by instilling the delusion that it can effectively confront China. The longer the nation indulges itself in this fantasy, the more harmful such dependence will become.

In the face of the turmoil in the Middle East, the current US approach amounts to nothing more than that of a paperhanger. While Washington has advocated for de-escalation in both Gaza and now Lebanon, its efforts have primarily involved cajoling the warring parties and international community rather than taking concrete actions to enforce a ceasefire.

As the world's two largest economies, China and the US should set an example of cooperation on important issues such as fentanyl control and jointly safeguard global public health security.

The greatest strength lies in unity and collaboration.

The leaders of the G7 should realize that a lack of internal prosperity and development will only make their displays of strength appear superficial. Instead of pointing fingers at other countries, they would be better off spending more time addressing their own issues, which might help restore the G7's significantly diminished reputation.

The giant pandas have witnessed the improvement of China-US relations. In the future, we hope they will continue to serve as "ambassadors" of peace, friendship, and cultural exchanges between the two nations.

On one hand, it is about rugby, on the other, it is about China's perceived influence. If Australia has truly linked these two unrelated matters, that would be laughable.

NATO's nuclear exercises are pushing the world into a more dangerous situation, warranting the vigilance of all people around the world.

We need a paradigm shift in the approach to global security.

Western media have appeared to function under a consistent principle – whenever international affairs are at play, they are framed as a stage for major power rivalry. Unsurprisingly, the just-concluded ASEAN Summit was once again interpreted through the lens of US-China competition. This time, however, what was revealed was not US' diplomatic advantage, but rather its increasingly visible diplomatic predicament.

How exactly is the US all in on Africa? Now we have the answer: just as US president is about to leave office, he finally remembers to visit the continent. But wait, the visit is being postponed again.

For a long time, the US has been the largest “hacker empire” in the world. Yet, the US often puts on a farcical act of “a thief crying stop thief.”

Japan's push for an “Asian NATO” threatens to disrupt decades of prosperity and stability in the Asia-Pacific region.

China's economy is like the Yangtze River; it draws strength from many sources. Its power comes not from a single industry but from the overall strength brought by diverse development.

China has chosen a suitable path for itself and achieved great success. This success should not be a reason for demonization.

The Global South countries, represented by China and Brazil, have delivered a message that is different from the self-centered West.

The Philippines believes the US is offering it sweets, but what the US actually provides is toxic, poisoning the Philippines' relations with China and other regional countries as well as undermining regional peace.

The US should reflect deeply on its historical and current policies in Latin America and make necessary changes, rather than interfering without justification and obstructing mutually beneficial cooperation between Latin America and other countries, particularly China.

As a regional power, India should respect Sri Lanka's sovereignty and the foreign development choices it makes based on its own interests. It should refrain from its hegemonic impulse to exert pressure on or interfere in Sri Lanka's external cooperation.

The West should reflect on its hypocrisy and double standards regarding environmental issues, stop backpedaling on climate matters, and start contributing to a green future for all humanity.

Global supply chains have become highly integrated, and interdependence among nations is increasingly close. Problems in any part of the supply chain can affect the security of the entire system.

Former US president Donald Trump was once again the target of an assassination attempt, marking the second such incident in two months. How many more bullets are aimed at American political figures? This event has thrust the issue of escalating political violence in the US into the spotlight.

Recently, German naval vessels have been making dangerous maneuvers in the Asia-Pacific region, increasing regional security risks and sending the wrong signal to forces in the area that rely on non-regional powers to stir up troubles. However, by attempting to showcase its military presence in the Asia-Pacific, Germany is not earning international respect; instead, it reveals a loss of common sense and rationality, presenting an embarrassing image as a country that has lost its way.

It is the people of Ukraine who have paid the price for the US and UK's instigation of "let's just fight" with their lives, while the two countries, who continue to stoke the flames, are calculating the political and economic benefits they stand to gain.

Planning to send warships to pass through the Taiwan Straits, Germany is abandoning its prudent and rational approach of over 20 years by undertaking a move with nothing to gain and everything to lose.

Former European Central Bank chief and Italian prime minister Mario Draghi presented a report at a news conference in Brussels on Monday, titled “The Future of European Competitiveness."

When the heads of CIA and MI6 appeared together publicly for the first time in their 77-year intelligence-sharing partnership over the weekend, they warned of an "unprecedented array of threats."

The Brazilian Supreme Court made this decision mainly because X failed to comply with the court's previous orders, including not appointing its legal representative in Brazil within the specified time limit.

Although the US has been trying hard to restrict China's high-tech development even at the expense of its allies' interests and the global supply chain, it not only hasn't achieved its desired outcome, but only to find itself surrounded by discontented allies.

Climate change requires all countries to collaborate in saving the planet.

Jane Wu's death is a great loss to the scientific research community. Yet, what it epitomizes more is a tragedy under the US' crooked tech suppression against China and anyone or anything related to that country.

Interfering with China's disputes with other countries or even China's domestic affairs has long been a tactic employed by the US and its allies. By taking sides and backing provocative actions in the South China Sea, they are only adding fuel to the fire and making it harder for parties involved to find a peaceful solution.

For those companies that follow the US in containing China, it will be challenging to return once they lose the Chinese market.

The Philippines has truly mastered the art of twisting the truth. It stirs up trouble in the South China Sea, escalates the situation, pushes it to the international stage, and then calls China the "biggest disruptor." It's like watching a ridiculous soap opera unfold before our eyes.

Australia overcame "last-minute concerns to secure" the Pacific Policing Initiative (PPI) on Wednesday during the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) held in Tonga. Experts pointed out that despite doubts from some island leaders, it is not surprising that this initiative was passed, as there is Western strategic pressure that is hard to resist.

On the political stage, Canada often seems to trail behind the US. After the US government's announcement in May of imposing high tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles (EV) and steel, the Canadian government has now decided to follow suit.

Black Myth: Wukong, a video game that embodies the dream of Chinese gamers to have a game deeply rooted in Chinese culture and on par with the best games globally, has been a major hit since its debut. However, just like every success China has had, Western media's criticism is never far behind.

As the 2024 Summit of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation in Beijing approaches, China-Africa relations have once again captured the attention of media worldwide. In fact, the West hasn't taken its eyes off the China-Africa relationship in recent years, worrying about China's influence in the region and around the world. Behind their eyes of surprise, skepticism and suspicion, lurks a sense of loss. So, why China?

Less than a week before the Pacific Islands Forum Leaders Meeting, a think tank is already intensifying its rhetoric about the strategic rivalry between the West and China in the Pacific region. The 53rd Pacific Islands Forum Leaders Meeting will be hosted by Tonga from August 26 to 30.

On Tuesday, a New York Times report caused quite a stir: US President Joe Biden has ordered US forces to prepare for "possible coordinated nuclear confrontations with Russia, China and North Korea." It sounds like the US president was instructing the military to prepare for doomsday, observers pointed out.

Recently, the internal division in South Korea toward Japan has intensified. The South Korean government's comments on the relationship between South Korea and Japan, as well as historical disputes, have sparked strong dissatisfaction among the South Korean opposition party and the public.

The idea of "fighting on multiple fronts" is seldom good news for military strategists. History shows that countries attempting to engage on several fronts, or even just two, often face disastrous outcomes. Yet in the US, there are growing calls advocating for involvement in three concurrent wars.

Americans have long viewed Latin America as their "backyard." This characterization increasingly sounds like an outdated political term laced with hegemony despite the nostalgia that Washington politicians may feel deep down.

For years, Japan has been trying to overcome the political stigma of being a defeated country from World War II. However, taking the wrong path could ultimately lead to its downfall.

The China-Brazil partnership is poised to become even more integral to the global geopolitical calculus. Their cooperation is both an emblem of the benefits of South-South collaboration and a harbinger of the increasing complexity of international relations in the 21st century.

The path to peace in Myanmar lies in finding a way for all parties to sit down and reconcile.