Study challenges farming norms
Livestock feed changes could free up food for 1b people
Diverting grain and other feed for livestock to human consumption could boost food supply sufficiently to feed an additional billion people, according to research released on Monday.
Many livestock animals and farmed fish are fed on foods such as cereals, fish and pulses that are edible for humans.
As the world struggles to feed hundreds of millions of people enough calories and nutrients to maintain their health, researchers in Finland examined what would happen if more food grown for animal consumption went to humans.
They analyzed global food system data for crop, livestock and aquaculture production, focusing on feed use and the availability of other potential food sources for animals, such as byproducts and residues of other farming processes that already exist.
Given the calorific needs of the world's animals and fish stocks, they calculated that switching out otherwise edible feed could increase global human food supply by 13 percent in terms of calories and by 15 percent in terms of protein.
"That's about 1 billion people," lead study author Vilma Sandstrom, from Finland's Aalto University, told AFP.
Around 15 percent of the more than 6 billion tons of animal feed consumed each year consists of products that could directly be used as human food.
Globally, 49 percent of feed use in aquaculture, 68 percent in poultry and 38 percent in pork meat production consists of food that is edible for humans, the paper showed.
The researchers identified readily available alternatives that are only edible for animals.
These included crop production byproducts such as straw, leaves, distiller's grains, sugar beet, rapeseed and cottonseed, as well as animal byproducts such as meat and bone meal.
"A lot of these are just left in the field or are wasted," said Sandstrom. "They are not necessarily ready to feed to animals immediately but this is one potential we have."
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned in July that the Russia-Ukraine conflict had combined with the lingering trade impacts of COVID-19 to create an "unprecedented global hunger crisis."
As well as diverting vital calories away from hungry people, growing crops to feed to livestock has an outsized impact on the environment and climate.
Meat production alone accounts for more than 14 percent of all greenhouse gas emissions and farming now uses more than three quarters of Earth's available freshwater.
"We are looking at different ways to help supply food for humanity within planetary boundaries," said Sandstrom.
"A lot of the feed that is fed now to livestock and aquaculture is something that we could consume. This is one of the leverage points we were looking for."
The study was published in the journal Nature Food.
Many livestock animals and farmed fish are fed on foods such as cereals, fish and pulses that are edible for humans.
As the world struggles to feed hundreds of millions of people enough calories and nutrients to maintain their health, researchers in Finland examined what would happen if more food grown for animal consumption went to humans.
They analyzed global food system data for crop, livestock and aquaculture production, focusing on feed use and the availability of other potential food sources for animals, such as byproducts and residues of other farming processes that already exist.
Given the calorific needs of the world's animals and fish stocks, they calculated that switching out otherwise edible feed could increase global human food supply by 13 percent in terms of calories and by 15 percent in terms of protein.
"That's about 1 billion people," lead study author Vilma Sandstrom, from Finland's Aalto University, told AFP.
Around 15 percent of the more than 6 billion tons of animal feed consumed each year consists of products that could directly be used as human food.
Globally, 49 percent of feed use in aquaculture, 68 percent in poultry and 38 percent in pork meat production consists of food that is edible for humans, the paper showed.
The researchers identified readily available alternatives that are only edible for animals.
These included crop production byproducts such as straw, leaves, distiller's grains, sugar beet, rapeseed and cottonseed, as well as animal byproducts such as meat and bone meal.
"A lot of these are just left in the field or are wasted," said Sandstrom. "They are not necessarily ready to feed to animals immediately but this is one potential we have."
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned in July that the Russia-Ukraine conflict had combined with the lingering trade impacts of COVID-19 to create an "unprecedented global hunger crisis."
As well as diverting vital calories away from hungry people, growing crops to feed to livestock has an outsized impact on the environment and climate.
Meat production alone accounts for more than 14 percent of all greenhouse gas emissions and farming now uses more than three quarters of Earth's available freshwater.
"We are looking at different ways to help supply food for humanity within planetary boundaries," said Sandstrom.
"A lot of the feed that is fed now to livestock and aquaculture is something that we could consume. This is one of the leverage points we were looking for."
The study was published in the journal Nature Food.
RELATED ARTICLES
