GT exclusive: WSJ-cited lab report on COVID-19 origins provides no new info, just 'pathetic story to push political agenda'
Published: Jun 08, 2021 01:10 PM
Wuhan Institute of Virology Photo:VCG

Wuhan Institute of Virology Photo:VCG

With US media and politicians again citing so-called "reports and evidence" hyping "the lab leak theory" on the question of COVID-19 origins, echoing US Secretary of State Antony Blinken's latest claim on the conspiracy, a source close to the WHO origins-tracing team told the Global Times on Tuesday that some politicians and so-called scientists are grasping for any pathetic story to push their political agenda. 

The Wall Street Journal published an article on Monday, citing a so-called national laboratory report, suggesting that the virus leaked from a Chinese lab, a hypothesis that has been rejected by preeminent scientists around the world and seen as "extremely unlikely" by the WHO study team after field research. It is a fresh move for the US media, without providing any new data or evidence, according to the source close to the WHO team, trying to turn the scientific question into a pure political game. 

The lab leak theory has constantly been rebuked by many scientists. Andy Rambaut, a professor at the University of Edinburgh, shared a research paper published Monday in Nature, providing solid evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 had a viable pathway for emergence from wildlife via intermediate hosts to people, which is also in line with the findings of the WHO-China team that visited Wuhan, Central China's Hubei Province earlier this year. 

The laboratory report, cited by the WSJ, came from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, which was prepared in May 2020, and was drawn on by the State Department when it conducted an inquiry into the pandemic's origins during the final months of the Trump administration, the WSJ report said. 

The lab has several staff working on tech and biotech but also many who work on projects related to intelligence, the source told the Global Times, noting that this would lead to their analyses requiring security clearance. 

"The thing about this report is that even if it contained any new information, it is not possible to share it publicly, so it doesn't help at all," the source said, referring to the report from the US national laboratory.

When the WSJ came up with another so-called exclusive report weeks ago citing a so-called Trump-era US intelligence report on sick staff at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, indicating those researchers shared symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and seasonable illness, Yuan Zhiming, director of the institute's Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory, refuted the report and called it "an outright lie that came from nowhere."

blog comments powered by Disqus